Decision guide

Retry Strategies Compared

How should clients retry failed calls?

Side by side

CriterionNo retryImmediate retryExponential backoff + jitterRetry with budget + breaker
Duplicate riskNoneIf not idempotentIf not idempotentIf not idempotent
Load during outagesLowestHighModerateBounded
Recovery from transient errorsNoneSomeGoodGood
Synchronization risk—HighLow (jitter)Low
ComplexityNoneTrivialLowMedium

When to choose each

No retry

Fail immediately and surface the error.

Choose when

  • Non-idempotent operations without keys
  • User-facing actions where the user can retry

Avoid when

  • Transient network errors on idempotent reads

Immediate retry

Retry once right away.

Choose when

  • Rare connection resets on idempotent calls

Avoid when

  • Overload situations (adds load instantly)

Exponential backoff + jitter

Delays grow exponentially, randomized; capped attempts.

Choose when

  • Default for idempotent/keyed calls
  • Fleets of clients

Avoid when

  • Tight latency budgets with no room to wait

Retry with budget + breaker

Backoff plus a cap on retry share of traffic and a breaker when dependency is unhealthy.

Choose when

  • Service-to-service calls at scale
  • Deep call graphs

Avoid when

  • Simple scripts

Verdict

Use exponential backoff with full jitter, 2–3 attempts, honoring Retry-After — and only for idempotent or keyed requests. At scale, add retry budgets and circuit breakers, and retry at one layer only.

Learn more

Sources